by Matt Rhodes on 16 January, 2011 - 15:03
When brands start social media monitoring, the ability to get real-time alerts whenever your brand is mentioned can be enlightening. Your inbox is suddenly filled, almost in real time, with every mention of your brand. The good, the band, and the ugly. The temptation can be to respond to all of these. To counteract every negative comment. To respond to and then spread every positive experience. To answer and resolve every question. This is only natural for people who care about the brands they work for. But the best approach is often not to respond. In fact, in many if not most instances, a brand should not respond to people talking about it online.

The real benefit of social media monitoring for brands is that it allows you to be aware of and listen in to conversations that you might not have known were going on otherwise. People who express their frustration with your product but would never have told you, advocates telling others just how great you are, or people sharing useful feedback and product development ideas. It’s great to see all of these things and the temptation is to respond. But more often than not, the best thing a brand can do is to not respond.o people ranting about your brand on a train you would be unlikely to interrupt. If you heard people talking in a cafe about great customer service they’d received from your team you would probably listen, feel proud and let them tell each other how great you are. There is no need to interrupt in these cases.
Doing nothing is often the most difficult thing to do. But it is often the right thing to do. If you overheard tw. A rant is probably just a rant and there is little you can do to change this. And people being positive are probably doing lots of good for you on their own without you needing to add anything. Whilst things are different in social media – notably that the comments can be seen by a much larger audience and that they are archived and searchable. But often the same rules apply.
If you have nothing to add, don’t say anything, and if you will only inflame a situation then stay out of it
Overall, brands should be careful about engaging online and have a clear process of when to respond, and when not to respond. There are two very clear cases where a brand should always step in:
In all other instances you should be more circumspect about getting involved. You should have a simple process for reacting and responding online and use this to help guide you. But overall you should do nothing more than you do something. Monitor, report on and learn from everything people say about you online. But don’t feel the need to get involved in every conversation.
Image1: [Roberto Bouza]
Image2: scottroberts via Flickr
Original Post: http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2011/01/social-media-monitoring-reacting-responding-online/
This blog reflects the personal opinions of individual contributors and does not represent the views of Futurelab, Futurelab's clients, or the contributors' respective employers or clients.
DHgate says:
17 Jan 2011, 12:31
Interesting perspective. Of course it would be foolish to interject yourself into every conversation, but when and where is worth knowing. I tend to avoid it when people are expressing negative opinions on things I can't solve - a simple counter-opinion would be no help. But as you say, correcting misapprehensions and mistatements, and seeking to solve problems, are valuable.
Add your comment