by: danah boydWhile I was off struggling with Leopard and pants, Pew put out another great report: Teens and Social Media. This report fleshes out what I noticed earlier
- teens are much more protective of the content they post online than
adults are. Yet, this report is sooo much more than that. Here are some of the new findings to whet your appetite:
Note: The bits on social network sites in the report are using
data collected in late 2005/early 2006. Much of those findings were
reported in an earlier Pew Report. I strongly believe that SNS use is up since then and that 55% is extremely low.
The whole report
is extremely interesting (and I strongly encourage you to read it), but
I want to take a moment to talk about the two statements that I bolded
in the list above. What Pew's data shows is that online participation
correlates with offline participation. They are not able to show
causality (and they do not try to claim that they can), but such a
correlation still contradicts the ever-present myth that online
activities cause a decline in offline activities. Of course, don't
misread this correlation in the opposite direction either. In other
words, you cannot say that if you get a group of teens involved online,
they will also get involved offline. Meshing these findings with my own
qualitative observations, I have a sneaking suspicion that what Pew's
data is pointing to is that the hyper-motivated and/or overly scheduled
teens from middle/upper class communities are extremely engaged offline
and use online technologies to socialize with their friends in the
interstitial times and that this cohort's content creation is primarily
to support friendships rather than create for creation sake. This also
makes sense because teens who have more free time tend to have less
restrictions and tend to prefer offline encounters with friends to
online ones.
I wasn't surprised by most of their findings, but one of them did make me raise my eyebrows: Teens from lower-income are more likely to blog.
Because of how Pew collects data, they cannot answer the question
"why?" when they find such correlations, but I figured that my
qualitative data might provide some insight and so I went back through
my data. When asked about blogging, most of my MySpace-dominant users
would immediately talk about the blogs that they kept on MySpace while
my Facebook-dominant teens would talk about how Xanga was "so middle
school" and that "everyone stopped" because "it just felt really weird
writing about my day to people that I didn't even care about." And then
it clicked. As I pointed out last summer and Eszter saw in her survey,
the MySpace/Facebook split is correlated with socio-economic status.
Because MySpace supports blogging and Facebook does not and because
many of the teens who were once on Xanga are now using one of the SNSs,
it makes sense that teens from lower-income households are more likely
to blog now. They are blogging on MySpace. Now, that outta be
interesting when these kids hit college where blogging is used as an
educational tool.
Original Post: http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/29/pew_on_teen_soc.html
This blog reflects the personal opinions of individual contributors and does not represent the views of Futurelab, Futurelab's clients, or the contributors' respective employers or clients.
Anthony Kuhn says:
02 Jan 2008, 02:17
Danah:
Thank you for your insightful views on the recent Pew report on Teens and Social Media. I wonder if one might suggest online social applications as the "third place" for teens, much as coffee shops aspire to be the third place for adults?
Happy New Year!
Add your comment