Marketing & Strategy Innovation

Enterprise 2.0 … Show me the ROI

by on 5 December, 2007 - 11:58

by: Christian Smagg

While Enterprise 2.0 is often described as “web 2.0 meets the enterprise”, what Enterprise 2.0 encompasses is much bigger. Enterprise 2.0 represents a radical change in the way businesses operate and is as much about the people, the culture and the processes as it is about the technology, tools and platforms.

More than simply Web 2.0 applied to business, Enterprise 2.0 could indeed be considered as the synthesis of new technologies, models, processes and mindsets that are revolutionizing the way business is conducted. Technologies and models have also emerged that have had a dramatic impact on the future of the industry: open source, offshoring, services-oriented architecture (SOA) and software as a service (SaaS). Rather than one single trend taking the lead, Enterprise 2.0 will be the combination of all of these new technologies and models.

In this context, measuring the impact and evaluating the ROI of Enterprise 2.0 is fast becoming a hot topic. Although these may not always be the technologies cited as the most widely used by companies across industries, collaborative and communications technologies (including wikis, blogs, and RSS) are usually considered as having immediate value for the organizations. We also find that those firms with the largest number of tools deployed see the best value, although no "killer combination" of tools has emerged yet.

Enterprise20costandroi

While many assert that Enterprise 2.0 technologies are subject to the same scrutiny as other investments, a general sense emerges that it is, in many cases, too soon to tell. However, these technologies can be assessed by their impact on business performance, which could be defined in many ways, including better customer engagement, more efficient collaboration within the company, and an improved ability to manage its online reputation. Executives also tend to invest in new technologies and processes because they hold out the promise of either increasing competitive advantage or reducing costs.

Much of the value of an Enterprise 2.0 deployment is incremental and "soft" in nature, and as a result, clear business value measurement remains elusive. In addition, most firms continue to use traditional value measurement techniques like ROI and total cost of ownership (TCO) when evaluating Enterprise 2.0 deployments. For marketers, this means a dual challenge of accommodating corporate value measurement expectations while helping them onto the right track for incremental and softer value realisation.

The reality is that the Enterprise 2.0 story still has a long way to go. The results will not be clearly quantified until the tools get into most workers’ hands and organisations understand the key elements of success with Enterprise 2.0.

Original Post: http://www.saastream.com/my_weblog/2007/09/enterprise-20-s.html

Share/Save
 

No comments

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Mollom CAPTCHA (play audio CAPTCHA)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated.

Recent content

  • Insights from the Natural Products Show /Marketing & Strategy Innovation Blog/ - Last week I attended the ... http://tinyurl.com/yhqdmvt
    1 day 5 hours ago
  • Happiness and a Better Enterprise Software Data Model /Marketing & Strategy Innovation Blog/ - by: Sigurd ... http://tinyurl.com/ye3hega
    1 day 5 hours ago
  • Real Time Brand Management /Marketing & Strategy Innovation Blog/ - On March 13, a Virgin America flight ... http://tinyurl.com/yd87obb
    1 day 5 hours ago
  • Must watch movie if you want to make sure the customer actually remembers the experience you offer http://bit.ly/dkKnqT #customer #nps
    2 days 10 hours ago
  • Spam Serialized /Marketing & Strategy Innovation Blog/ - Maybe this is, like, email marketing 101 (and if ... http://tinyurl.com/yfw56np
    3 days 52 min ago

This blog reflects the personal opinions of individual contributors and does not represent the views of Futurelab, Futurelab's clients, or the contributors' respective employers or clients.

Subscribe



Archive